Gamma Knife radiosurgery for the treatment of cluster headache: a systematic review.

Cluster headache (CH) is a severe trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia that, when refractory to medical treatment, can be treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). The outcomes of studies investigating GKRS for CH in the literature are inconsistent, and the ideal target and treatment parameters remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the safety and the efficacy, both short and long term, of GKRS for the treatment of drug-resistant CH. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all clinical articles discussing GKRS for the treatment of CH. The literature review revealed 5 studies describing outcomes of GKRS for the treatment of CH for a total of 52 patients (48 included in the outcome analysis). The trigeminal nerve, the sphenopalatine ganglion, and a combination of both were treated in 34, 1, and 13 patients. The individual studies demonstrated initial meaningful pain reduction in 60-100% of patients, with an aggregate initial meaningful pain reduction in 37 patients (77%). This effect persisted in 20 patients (42%) at last follow-up. Trigeminal sensory disturbances were observed in 28 patients (58%) and deafferentation pain in 3 patients (6%). Information related to GKRS for CH are limited to few small open-label studies using heterogeneous operative techniques. In this setting, short-term pain reduction rates are high, whereas the long-term results are controversial. GKRS targeted on the trigeminal nerve or sphenopalatine ganglion is associated to a frequent risk of trigeminal disturbances and possibly deafferentation pain.

Surgical Treatment for the Cluster Headache: Clinical Experience.

BACKGROUND: Cluster headache (CH) refers to the most painful primary headache that sometimes leads to poor quality of life and associated disability. So far, no treatment has been found to cure CHs. In this study, we introduce a novel and effective surgery for CH. METHODS: We studied 6 patients with CH diagnosed according to the criteria of the Headache Classification Committee of the IHS, third edition, who were eligible for surgical treatment on the basis of strong requirements. All of them underwent temporal craniectomy and transection of the greater superficial petrosal nerve and deep petrosal nerve pathway to the sphenopalatine ganglion. RESULTS: All 6 patients had the surgery for CH and follow-up per 3 months. We significantly cured their pain and autonomic dysfunction. In the follow-up process none of the patients had reoccurring alacrimia. All of them had reduction of secretion of nasal, oral mucosa, and parotid and were satisfied with the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: All 6 patients with CH received surgery by transection greater superficial petrosal nerve and deep petrosal nerve pathway to the sphenopalatine ganglion and were completely cured, and adverse events and serious complications did not occur.

Eficacia y seguridad del tratamiento quirúrgico en la cefalea en racimos / Efficacy and safety of surgical treatment of cluster headache

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: La cefalea en racimos (CR) es la cefalea humana más grave y se cronifica en un 10-20% de los pacientes, pudiendo llegar a ser refractaria a todos los fármacos eficaces en un 10% de ellos. En este escenario se indican procedimientos quirúrgicos: radiofrecuencias del ganglio esfenopalatino ipsilateral al dolor (RF-GEFP), estimulación bilateral de los nervios occipitales (E-NOM) y estimulación cerebral profunda (ECP) del hipotálamo posteroinferior ipsilateral. Se ha analizado específicamente la eficacia y seguridad de cada una de ellas, pero no se ha descrito la evolución de una serie de pacientes siguiendo este itinerario quirúrgico por orden de agresividad. PACIENTES: Pacientes con CR crónica y refractaria según los criterios de la European Headache Federation. Fueron sometidos secuencialmente a RF-GEFP, E-NOM si ineficacia del anterior y ECP si ineficacia del anterior. RESULTADOS: Incluimos prospectivamente a 44 pacientes entre noviembre de 2003 y junio de 2018 con una edad media de 38,3 años siendo el 70% hombres. El seguimiento medio fue de 87,4 meses. Respondieron a 74 procedimientos de RF-GEFP 19 pacientes (33,3%). De los 25 restantes, se implantó un dispositivo de E-NOM en 22 de ellos, mostrando una eficacia del 50%. Finalmente, se sometieron a ECP del hipotálamo posteroinferior ipsilateral 9 pacientes con una eficacia del 88,8%. No se constataron complicaciones graves en ninguno de los 3 procedimientos. CONCLUSIONES: La aplicación secuencial de los 3 procedimientos quirúrgicos logró revertir la grave situación de CR crónica y refractaria a una CR episódica en el 93% de los pacientes con una morbilidad quirúrgica aceptable

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cluster headache (CR) is the most severe human headache and is chronic in 10%-20% of patients, and 10% can become refractory to all effective drugs. In this scenario, surgical procedures are indicated: radiofrequencies of the sphenopalatine ganglion ipsilateral to pain (RF-SPG), bilateral stimulation of the occipital nerves (NOM-S) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ipsilateral posterior hypothalamus. The efficacy and safety of each of these procedures has been specifically analyzed, but the progress of a series of patients following this surgical route in order of aggressiveness has not been described. PATIENTS: Patients with chronic and refractory CR according to the criteria of the European Headache Federation. The patients underwent RF-SPG, NOM-S sequentially if the previous procedure had been ineffective, and DBS if the previous procedure had been ineffective. RESULTS: We prospectively included 44 patients between November 2003 and June 2018 with an average age of 38.3 years; 70% were men. The mean follow-up was 87.4 months. Nineteen patients responded to 74 procedures of RF-SPG (33.3%). Of the remaining 25 patients, a NOM-S device was implanted in 22, showing an efficacy of 50%. Finally, 9 patients underwent ECP of the ipsilateral lower-posterior hypothalamus with an efficacy of 88.8%. No serious complications were found following any of these 3 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential application of these three surgical procedures succeeded in reversing the serious situation of chronic CR refractory to an episodic CR in 93% of patients with acceptable surgical morbidity

Efficacy and safety of surgical treatment of cluster headache. / Eficacia y seguridad del tratamiento quirúrgico en la cefalea en racimos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cluster headache (CR) is the most severe human headache and is chronic in 10%-20% of patients, and 10% can become refractory to all effective drugs. In this scenario, surgical procedures are indicated: radiofrequencies of the sphenopalatine ganglion ipsilateral to pain (RF-SPG), bilateral stimulation of the occipital nerves (NOM-S) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ipsilateral posterior hypothalamus. The efficacy and safety of each of these procedures has been specifically analyzed, but the progress of a series of patients following this surgical route in order of aggressiveness has not been described. PATIENTS: Patients with chronic and refractory CR according to the criteria of the European Headache Federation. The patients underwent RF-SPG, NOM-S sequentially if the previous procedure had been ineffective, and DBS if the previous procedure had been ineffective. RESULTS: We prospectively included 44 patients between November 2003 and June 2018 with an average age of 38.3 years; 70% were men. The mean follow-up was 87.4 months. Nineteen patients responded to 74 procedures of RF-SPG (33.3%). Of the remaining 25 patients, a NOM-S device was implanted in 22, showing an efficacy of 50%. Finally, 9 patients underwent ECP of the ipsilateral lower-posterior hypothalamus with an efficacy of 88.8%. No serious complications were found following any of these 3 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential application of these three surgical procedures succeeded in reversing the serious situation of chronic CR refractory to an episodic CR in 93% of patients with acceptable surgical morbidity.

Long-term efficacy of superficial temporal artery ligation and auriculotemporal nerve transection for temporal cluster headache in adolescent.

OBJECTIVES: Cluster headache is a primary headache disorder, which has affected up to 0.1% population. Superficial temporal artery ligation combined with auriculotemporal nerve transection (SLAT) is one of the surgical alternatives to treat the drug-resistant temporal cluster headache (TCH). The current work aimed to assess the effect of SLAT on TCH patients based on the very long-term clinical follow-up. METHODS: The current retrospective study had enrolled 20 adolescent TCH patients undergoing SLAT between December 2016 and January 2018. The headache diaries as well as the pain severity questionnaire of the visual analog scale (VAS) had been collected to measure the pain severity before and after surgery. RESULTS: The pain-free rates 3 days, as well as 1, 6, and 12 months, after SLAT surgery were 2.00%, 10.00%, 25.00%, and 70.00%, respectively. The frequency of TCH attack daily was found to be markedly reduced on the whole; besides, the pain degree was also remarkably decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Results in this study indicate that the sustained headache can be relieved after SLAT in adolescent patients with intractable TCH.

Vidian Neurectomy for Management of Chronic Cluster Headache.

BACKGROUND: Management of chronic cluster headache (CCH) remains a challenging endeavor, and the optimal surgical approach for medically refractory CCH remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a preliminary evaluation of the efficacy and safety of vidian neurectomy (VN) in patients with medically refractory CCH. METHODS: Between March 2013 and December 2015, 9 CCH patients, all of whom had failed to respond to conservative therapy, underwent VN with a precise nerve cut and maximal preservation of the sphenopalatine ganglion. Data included demographic variables, cluster headache onset and duration, mean attack frequency, mean attack intensity, and pain disability index measures pre- and through 12-mo postsurgery. RESULTS: Seven of the 9 cases (77.8%) showed immediate improvement. Improvement was delayed by 1 mo in 1 patient, after which the surgical effects of pain relief were maintained throughout the follow-up period. One patient (11.1%) did not improve after surgery. One year after VN, patients' mean attack frequency, mean attack intensity, and pain disability index decreased by 54.5%, 52.9%, and 56.4%, respectively. No patient experienced treatment-related side effects or complications. CONCLUSION: VN is an effective treatment method for CCH patients. Precise Vidian nerve identification and maximal preservation of the sphenopalatine ganglion may achieve good surgical outcomes and dramatically improve quality of life among patients, without significant adverse events.

Improved surgical procedure using intraoperative navigation for the implantation of the SPG microstimulator in patients with chronic cluster headache.

INTRODUCTION: The ATI SPG microstimulator is designed to be fixed on the posterior maxilla, with the integrated lead extending into the pterygopalatine fossa to electrically stimulate the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) as a treatment for cluster headache. Preoperative surgical planning to ensure the placement of the microstimulator in close proximity (within 5 mm) to the SPG is critical for treatment efficacy. The aim of this study was to improve the surgical procedure by navigating the initial dissection prior to implantation using a passive optical navigation system and to match the post-operative CBCT images with the preoperative treatment plan to verify the accuracy of the intraoperative placement of the microstimulator. METHODS: Custom methods and software were used that result in a 3D rotatable digitally reconstructed fluoroscopic image illustrating the patient-specific placement with the ATI SPG microstimulator. Those software tools were preoperatively integrated with the planning software of the navigation system to be used intraoperatively for navigated placement. Intraoperatively, the SPG microstimulator was implanted by completing the initial dissection with CT navigation, while the final position of the stimulator was verified by 3D CBCT. Those reconstructed images were then immediately matched with the preoperative CT scans with the digitally inserted SPG microstimulator. This method allowed for visual comparison of both CT scans and verified correct positioning of the SPG microstimulator. RESULTS: Twenty-four surgeries were performed using this new method of CT navigated assistance during SPG microstimulator implantation. Those results were compared to results of 21 patients previously implanted without the assistance of CT navigation. Using CT navigation during the initial dissection, an average distance reduction of 1.2 mm between the target point and electrode tip of the SPG microstimulator was achieved. Using the navigation software for navigated implantation and matching the preoperative planned scans with those performed post-operatively, the average distance was 2.17 mm with navigation, compared to 3.37 mm in the 28 surgeries without navigation. CONCLUSION: Results from this new procedure showed a significant reduction (p = 0.009) in the average distance from the SPG microstimulator to the desired target point. Therefore, a distinct improvement could be achieved in positioning of the SPG microstimulator through the use of intraoperative navigation during the initial dissection and by post-operative matching of pre- and post-operatively performed CBCT scans.

A Case Report About Cluster-Tic Syndrome Due to Venous Compression of the Trigeminal Nerve.

BACKGROUND: The term "cluster-tic syndrome" is used for the rare ipsilateral co-occurrence of attacks of cluster headache and trigeminal neuralgia. Medical treatment should combine treatment for cluster headache and trigeminal neuralgia, but is very often unsatisfactory. CASE: Here, we describe a 41-year-old woman diagnosed with cluster-tic syndrome who underwent microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve, primarily aimed at the "trigeminal neuralgia" part of her pain syndrome. After venous decompression of the trigeminal nerve both a decrease in trigeminal neuralgia and cluster headache attacks was seen. However, the headache did not disappear completely. Furthermore, she reported a decrease in pain intensity of the remaining cluster headache attacks. DISCUSSION: This case description suggests that venous vascular decompression in cluster-tic syndrome can be remarkably effective, both for trigeminal neuralgia and cluster headache.

The surgical management of cephalalgia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Management of headache disorders is not part of most craniomaxillofacial surgery practices; however there are certain indications for surgical management of headaches by the craniomaxillofacial surgeon. RECENT FINDINGS: Migraine headaches are the most amenable to surgical management and while the exact mechanism of migraine is unknown, a central or peripheral trigger such as compressive neuropathy of trigeminal nerve branches leading to neurogenic inflammation has been suggested. The primary management for episodic migraine headache should be lifestyle modification and medication, whereas for chronic migraine (>15 headache days/month) use of medication and botulinum neurotoxin is effective, whereas some patients may choose to explore surgical options. Trigger site decompression for chronic migraine surgically relieves anatomic impingement at various sites and has been shown to reduce by at least 50% the frequency, intensity, and duration of headaches in over 85% and elimination of headaches in almost 60%. Trigger points may also lead to exacerbation of cluster headaches and treatment with botulinum neurotoxin may reduce attacks. SUMMARY: Trigger site decompression is an effective treatment for chronic migraine, as are botulinum neurotoxin injections in reducing attacks in cluster headaches. The craniomaxillofacial surgeon is uniquely qualified to treat these primary headache disorders.

Computerized tomography-guided sphenopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment in 16 patients with refractory cluster headaches: Twelve- to 30-month follow-up evaluations.

BACKGROUND: Sphenopalatine ganglion percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation treatment can improve the symptoms of cluster headaches to some extent. However, as an ablation treatment, radiofrequency thermocoagulation treatment also has side effects. OBJECTIVE: To preliminarily evaluate the efficacy and safety of a non-ablative computerized tomography-guided pulsed radiofrequency treatment of sphenopalatine ganglion in patients with refractory cluster headaches. METHODS: We included and analysed 16 consecutive cluster headache patients who failed to respond to conservative therapy from the Pain Management Center at the Beijing Tiantan Hospital between April 2012 and September 2013 treated with pulsed radiofrequency treatment of sphenopalatine ganglion. RESULTS: Eleven of 13 episodic cluster headaches patients and one of three chronic cluster headaches patient were completely relieved of the headache within an average of 6.3 ± 6.0 days following the treatment. Two episodic cluster headache patients and two chronic cluster headache patients showed no pain relief following the treatment. The mean follow-up time was 17.0 ± 5.5 months. All patients enrolled in this study showed no treatment-related side effects or complications. CONCLUSION: Our data show that patients with refractory episodic cluster headaches were quickly, effectively and safely relieved from the cluster period after computerized tomography-guided pulsed radiofrequency treatment of sphenopalatine ganglion, suggesting that it may be a therapeutic option if conservative treatments fail.

[Cluster headache treatment]. / Traitements de l'algie vasculaire de la face.

UNLABELLED: Acute treatment: sumatriptan, oxygen inhalation. Prophylactic treatment: verapamil, lithium carbonate. Transitional treatment. SURGICAL TREATMENT: deep brain stimulation, occipital nerve stimulation, stimulation of the sphenopalatin ganglion.

Cluster-like headache responsive to phlebotomy.

We report the first case of cluster-like headache secondary to polycythaemia vera (PV) that responded to phlebotomy as part of PV treatment.

Drug-resistant cluster headache: long-term evaluation of pain control by posterior hypothalamic deep-brain stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: On the basis of recent findings about the pathophysiology of cluster headache and through the experience reported in recent literature, we have reviewed the outcome of four patients affected by drug-resistant cluster headache treated in our department by posterior hypothalamic deep brain stimulation with a follow-up of more than 5 years. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2006, we selected four patients affected by cluster headache. The diagnosis was based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders II criteria, and all patients were refractory to drug therapy. Under local anesthesia they underwent stereotactic positioning of a stimulation electrode within the posterior hypothalamus, ipsilateral to the site of pain. An intraoperative neurophysiological test stimulation was performed to assess possible side effects and symptoms related to hypothalamic neuronal activity. A second surgery was then performed with the patient under general anesthesia to implant the extension cable and the implantable pulse generator. RESULTS: After 5 years of follow up, all patients had a valuable benefit with a reduction in episode frequency from 90% to 50% associated with a decrease in pain intensity perception. CONCLUSION: The long-lasting pain reduction and the improvement in the patients' symptoms should be considered a real positive prospective, not only because there was uncertainty about the persistence of the beneficial effects at a long-term follow-up, but also for the improvement of the quality of life. The stimulation can restore important aspects concerning the psychic condition that very often constitutes an important limiting factor in normal daily life for this type of patient.

Relief from cluster headaches following extraction of an ipsilateral infected tooth.

A 60-year-old man with a 7-year history of cluster headaches was seen by an oral surgeon for evaluation of pain in the left upper second molar ipsilateral to the side affected by the headaches. During extraction of the tooth, infection, decay, and inflammation were discovered. Since the extraction in November 2008, the patient has experienced one episode of cluster headaches as of April 2013.

A new minimally invasive technique for cauterizing the maxillary artery and its application in the treatment of cluster headache.

PURPOSE: To describe a new, relatively atraumatic method of cauterizing the maxillary artery and its effectiveness in treating cluster headache. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients with cluster headache were treated with arterial ligation of certain terminal branches of the external carotid artery. A new, atraumatic method of cauterizing the maxillary artery is described. RESULTS: The success rate and postoperative morbidity are presented. In four out of five patients the cluster attacks ceased immediately following surgery. CONCLUSION: A new intraoral technique for maxillary artery cauterization and the effectiveness of cauterization of the terminal branches of the external carotid artery in the treatment of cluster headache are described. Although the sample is small, the results are encouraging, and may offer permanent relief of cluster headache pain.

Success, failure, and putative mechanisms in hypothalamic stimulation for drug-resistant chronic cluster headache.

Drug-resistant chronic cluster headache (CH) is an unremitting illness with excruciatingly severe headaches that occur several times daily. Starting in 2000, a total of 19 patients with long-lasting chronic CH, with multiple daily attacks unresponsive to all known prophylactics, received stimulation of the posterior inferior hypothalamic area ipsilateral to the pain as treatment. We report long-term follow-up (median 8.7 years, range 6-12 years) in 17 patients. Long-lasting improvement occurred in 70% (12 of 17): 6 are persistently almost pain-free; another 6 no longer experience daily attacks but rather episodic CH interspersed with long-lasting remissions. In 5 of 6 almost pain-free patients, the stimulators have been off for a median of 3 years (range 3-4 years). Five patients did not improve: 4 had bilateral CH, and 3 developed tolerance after experiencing relief for 1-2 years. Adverse events are electrode displacement (n=2), infection (electrode n=3; generator n=1), electrode malpositioning (n=1), transient nonsymptomatic third ventricle hemorrhage (n=1), persistent slight muscle weakness on one side (n=1), and seizure (n=1). This exceptionally long follow-up shows that hypothalamic stimulation for intractable chronic CH produces long-lasting improvement in many patients. Previous experience was limited to a median of 16 months. Important new findings are as follows: stimulation is well tolerated for many years after implantation; after several years during which stimulation was necessary for relief, a persistent almost pain-free condition can be maintained when stimulation is off, suggesting that hypothalamic stimulation can change disease course; tolerance can occur after marked long-lasting improvement; and bilateral chronic CH seems to predict poor response to hypothalamic stimulation.

Cluster-like headache secondary to parasagittal hemangiopericytoma.

We describe an original case of cluster-like headache CLH) revealing a parasagittal tumor invading the superior sagittal sinus (SSS). Resection of the tumor (hemangiopericytoma) allowed the re-permeabilization of the SSS and was followed by the complete disappearance of CLH. Several mechanisms including obstruction of the SSS, hypervascularization with arterio-veinous shunt, and overflow in the cavernous sinus might explain the symptoms.

Predilection to deafferentation pain syndrome after radiosurgery in cluster headache.

Cluster-tic syndrome is a rare, disabling disorder. We report the first case of cluster-tic syndrome with a successful response to stereotactic radiosurgery. After failing optimal medical treatment, a 58-year-old woman suffering from cluster-tic syndrome was treated with gamma knife radiosurgery. The trigeminal nerve and sphenopalatine ganglion were targeted with a maximum dose of 85 and 90 Gy respectively. The patient experienced a complete resolution of the initial pain, but developed, as previously described after radiosurgical treatment for cluster headache, a trigeminal nerve dysfunction. This suggests that trigeminal nerve sensitivity to radiosurgery can be extremely different depending on the underlying pathological condition, and that there is an abnormal sensitivity of the trigeminal nerve in cluster headache patients. We do not recommend trigeminal nerve radiosurgery for treatment of cluster headache.